Interdimensional Slave Drivers
Monopoly, the Commodification of Everything, and Interdimensional Slave Drivers
“As a country becomes more and more developed, the one thing that gets eroded is community. The village disappears and what you have to do is you have to buy the village back. You have to buy somebody to look after your kid. You have to buy somebody to help you clean your house. You have to buy somebody to help you cook. I’m always amazed at the con of it all. This ‘machine, this larger thing, told everyone: ‘You should get your own house and you should live by yourselves, how could you still live with your parents? In the same house? This is ridiculous!’”
Trevor Noah
Imagine needing a subscription to access water.
Imagine paying a monthly fee just to stand on a patch of land, or to breathe clean air.
Imagine having to pay someone just to hug your children.
Apart from the last entry, the examples given above don’t represent some future dystopian state but, rather, the inhumane logical endpoint of a system that treats everything as a potential commodity and people as having instrumental, instead of ultimate, value.
Modern societies increasingly operate on the assumption that anything and everything can, and should, be transacted, bought, or sold. But when we allow market logic to expand without constraint and let price tags dictate the value of everything, we lose sight of what was once understood to be sacred, in the sense of being ‘beyond trade’. Accordingly, there is an inversely proportional relationship between the sense of the sacred and the penetration of trade within a society; the more of one, the less of the other. God and the market are at loggerheads.
And this is where I diverge from many other critiques of the capitalist system: I make the claim that we are slaves to interdimensional beings who use the economic system to control humanity. A strange claim, to be sure, but hopefully it becomes less strange as more and more evidence comes out with time.
The Tiv and the Spheres of Exchange
Anthropologists Paul and Laura Bohannan studied the Tiv people of Nigeria and noticed something profound: their society was organized around multiple, distinct spheres of exchange. In Tiv culture, not everything could be traded for everything else as there were moral and cultural boundaries that protected some aspects of life from commodification.
The first sphere, considered the most open, deals with subsistence goods: food, simple tools, and livestock traded in everyday market transactions. These exchanges are impersonal; once the deal is done, no ongoing relationship is expected. Crucially, Tiv avoid engaging in this kind of “market” exchange with kin or close friends because doing so would degrade the social bond by treating it as merely transactional.
The second sphere concerns prestigious items, like woven cloth, brass rods, and formerly, even slaves. These objects carry symbolic weight and can only be exchanged for similarly prestigious goods. Importantly, they cannot be traded for basic subsistence items without violating deep cultural taboos; to do so would imply reducing human life or honor to the level of consumables. (Of course, I’m aware of the fact that to even legitimize slave-owning in the first place is to reduce humanity to a base level, but it’s the principle of value hierarchies which I’m concerned with here.)
The third and highest sphere is that of marriage and human relationships, where what is exchanged are not objects, but people themselves, ideally in symmetrical, long-term relationships between kin groups. Here, reciprocity matters deeply, and any attempt to reduce these human exchanges to monetary terms would be not just inappropriate, but morally offensive.
We don’t have a similar division in the West; it seems that everything is fair game to be commodified and privatized:
Large companies like Nestle extract millions of litres of water from indigenous land, leaving residents with no drinking water.
You can buy passports for the right price, such as in my country of Malta! (Although this ‘golden passport scheme’ as it was known has been recognized as being in violation of EU law.)
Sex trafficking operates on the basis of slavery, namely the buying of human beings. It’s a depressingly lucrative trade: a 2024 International Labour Organisation estimate put this figure at $173 billion in illegal profits annually. This is not to mention child sex trafficking.
This tripartite model of the Tiv matters because it helps us understand what modern capitalism erases: not all things are of equal value, and not all exchanges are morally equivalent. When societies maintain separate spheres of exchange, they preserve a sense of moral hierarchy: some things—like love, honor, food, water, land, or life—are literally priceless and should never be reduced to monetary transactions, even though they frequently are. To collapse this hierarchy certainly makes it easier to trade everything under the sun but it also leads to treating priceless things as mere commodities.
After all, would you like to be sold off to the highest bidder?
Monopoly and Slavery
In the board game Monopoly, everyone starts out on an equal footing, but by design, the game ends with one person owning everything and everyone else bankrupt. This game (which was stolen and repackaged by a corporation for profit, ironically) was originally created to demonstrate the dangers of speculative land ownership and unregulated markets.
Once we allow essential goods like land, housing, or water to become commodified (bought and sold for private profit) they cease to be universally accessible and, instead, become privileges available only to those who can afford them. This is a feature, not a bug, of the market system; markets don’t guarantee access but allocate based on purchasing power. As a result, people are inevitably locked out of essentials, not because of any personal failing, but because that’s how markets work.
Commodification invites monopoly. If someone can buy up housing and resell it at inflated prices, or hoard water rights to profit from scarcity, they will—and the market will reward them for this psychopathy. It’s just good business, right? The more ruthless the extraction, the higher the reward.
When everything necessary for life is behind a paywall, the only way to access it is with money. And to get money, you must sell your time, your energy, your attention to the highest bidder. In this way, a monopoly system rooted in commodification enslaves you, which is precisely what I mean when I say that almost everyone is a slave.
So the question then becomes: when the things we need to survive are treated like any other product, commodities to be owned, traded, and speculated upon, what happens to the people who can’t pay?
In this psychopathic society, people only have instrumental value, which means that they’re only allowed access to life’s necessities, and therefore life itself, if they can sacrifice their time, energy, and attention for the benefit of the top of the pyramid. If they can’t do that, either because they physically cannot or because they would rather not contribute to the enslavement camp of society, then they’re on their own and are free to starve.
The Absurdity of Human Rights in a Market System
We like to talk about human rights: the rights to housing, water, food, and dignity. But in a transactional system, these rights become meaningless platitudes if they’re locked behind a paywall. What does it mean to say someone has a right to water, say, if they can’t afford it? What’s the point of proclaiming the right to shelter if housing is a speculative investment?
The idea of universal human rights collapses in the face of economic exclusion and extreme inequality. If access to the essentials of life is gated behind money, then rights become conditional luxuries while the majority are left to navigate a landscape of performative legality and actual deprivation. It’s like being told you can eat from a banquet table while being chained to a wall just out of reach. You may have the right to eat technically, but what does that mean in practice?
Interdimensional Slave Drivers
I think anyone with half a brain will agree to something of the above analysis – only people who are entirely compromised by the system or have a lot to lose will disagree.
But this next part is where I have my work cut out for me because most people are still under the spell of naturalism and humanism, truly believing that humanity is the apex predator on the face of the earth.
But I don’t believe this to be the case: humanity is enslaved to non-human intelligences (NHI). I have to be completely upfront and say that the precise nature of these slave-drivers is not entirely evident to me at this stage, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that, not only are we not alone in the universe, we never were.
Consider the words of former White House official Catherine Austin Fitts, who claimed (on the Danny Jones podcast) that the world is being run by a mysterious group called 'Mr Global', a committee of intelligent beings from other dimensions, and that our world leaders are merely their puppets. "I think you have interdimensional intelligence, which is operating demonic intelligence."
Or Tucker Carlson, speaking on the Shawn Ryan podcast, who expressed the belief that UAPs and UFOs are spiritual in nature. "I think it's a really old story. That’s what I believe. I’m a Christian, and I try to be sincere about it. But there are striking commonalities across all the world religions and creation myths I’m aware of. One of the most consistent themes, and this is especially true in Christianity, is the belief that supernatural beings can take physical form. All of them seem to agree on this. The Greek myths, the story of Jesus, most famously, show that these beings aren’t just ethereal shadows or fog. They step out of their realm and into ours. The Bible is full of these kinds of events: spiritual beings taking tangible, physical form to interact with humanity. Some are benevolent, some malevolent — but they cross that boundary." On Joe Rogan’s podcast Carlson asked: “What is the U.S. government's relationship with these things? There’s evidence that a relationship exists and that it’s longstanding. That raises a lot of questions about intent. People have been hurt by these things. That’s a fact. A knowable, provable fact. Some have even been killed. Now, I’m not saying millions of people have died because of whatever these things are, but people have died, and we know this because it's making its way through the courts via the VA. We’re talking about an object, or a phenomenon, that is by definition supernatural. It operates above the laws of nature as we understand them. And it’s resulted in human deaths. We don’t spend nearly enough time thinking about what that all adds up to. And honestly? It’s not good. Not good at all.”
Or lawyer and author William Bramley, in his book The Gods of Eden, who argues that many of the problems that plague human civilization such as endless war, religious conflict, and systems of control can be traced back to ancient times, to interference by extraterrestrial beings. According to Bramley, these beings, whom early humans often worshipped as gods, have been quietly steering the course of human history for their own purposes. He paints a picture of a hidden hand shaping empires, stirring conflict, and keeping humanity in a state of ignorance and division. The book connects dots between ancient astronaut theory, secret societies, and recurring patterns of control that stretch from Sumer and Egypt to modern times.
Or former professor of Biological Anthropology Dr Arthur David Horn who has concluded that humanity was seeded by an extraterrestrial race and that mainstream narratives of human history—whether scientific or religious—are fundamentally distorted to obscure humanity’s true extraterrestrial influences. He proposes that humans were genetically engineered and guided by intelligent extraterrestrial beings, and that regressive ET factions, often working with humans, actively suppress this knowledge to hinder human spiritual evolution.
Or researcher David Icke who claims that the world is controlled by entities taking reptilian and other forms that exist on another dimension parallel to our dimension and, in order to operate in our third dimension, these fourth-dimensional reptilians needed a third-dimensional human form which they created by blending their own DNA with that of certain humans. Icke goes on to say that this “race of interbreeding [reptile-human hybrid] bloodlines were centered in the Middle East and Near East in the ancient world and over thousands of years since, have expanded their power across the globe [through] a network of mystery schools and secret societies, creating institutions like religions to mentally and emotionally imprison the masses and set them at war with one another.” I’m not unaware of how absurd it sounds to take this idea seriously, but if you were to dive deeper, you will realize the surprising wealth of evidence that corroborates this position.
Or inimitable chronicler of arcana and anomalies Charles Fort, after whom the term Fortean, denoting paranormal phenomena, was coined, once claimed that the Earth is the property of some unknown ‘other’. “I think we’re property,” he wrote, continuing, “I should say we belong to something. That once upon a time, this Earth was No-Man’s Land, that other worlds explored and colonized here, and fought among themselves for possession, but that now it’s owned by something: that something owns this earth—all others warned off. I suspect that all of this has been known, perhaps for ages, to certain ones upon the earth, a cult or order, members of which function like bellwethers to the rest of us, or as superior slaves or overseers, directing us in accordance with instructions received—from Somewhere else—in our mysterious usefulness.”
Or American journalist Jim Marrs’ words who, after reviewing case after case of nonhuman contact throughout history in his book Our Occulted History says: “The evidence of ancient nonhuman visitation is compelling, almost overwhelming. Cave drawings, cuneiform tablets of clay, biblical descriptions, and existing anomalous artifacts attest to the reality of such a presence down through history. Assuming the ancient Sumerian tablets are based on truth, extraterrestrials were on earth millennia ago. Did they all leave at some point, or are some still here? The answer may be found by simply reviewing human history. We are taught that humans slowly evolved from hunter-gatherers to farmers who gathered in city states, which became nations and empires. Yet a close scrutiny of history also tells of legends of marvelous lost civilizations, amazing artefacts, and reports from around the world of gods flying in ancient times—the flying dragons of the Chinese, the vimanas of the Hindus, the soaring boats of the Egyptians, the flying shields of Alexander, the airships of 1896-97, and the UFOs of today. Someone has been with us all through recorded history.”
Taken together, these voices, from academics and journalists to insiders and whistleblowers, form a chorus that cannot be so easily dismissed. They suggest that humanity’s long history may not be entirely our own, that hidden hands and nonhuman intelligences may have been guiding (or misguiding) us all along. Whether cast as interdimensional overlords, alien manipulators, or spiritual parasites, the idea that we are not the apex of our own story begins to take on weight.
Unless we take this possibility seriously, we will never truly understand the nature of our predicament. And if we don’t understand the nature of our predicament, how can we hope to change it?